...because apparently, no one can seem to come up with a convincing reason to trust them over anyone else.
Is the truth about the 9/11 crash of Flight 77 to be found in the link I referenced here, or in this month's cover story in Popular Mechanics? I read bits of the article in the hard copy version. But, apart from the "We're PM, b!+ch!" vibe, I really didn't see any reason to trust that their interpretation of the facts was necessarily any more valid thanthe ones from various wackos anyone else's. Oh sure, PM's photos were cleaner. Being a long-running print magazine doesn't hurt, either. Neither does not having hard rock music playing behind your thankfully absent Flash presentation.
So, what happened? I don't know, but I've got more coffee to drink.
Is the truth about the 9/11 crash of Flight 77 to be found in the link I referenced here, or in this month's cover story in Popular Mechanics? I read bits of the article in the hard copy version. But, apart from the "We're PM, b!+ch!" vibe, I really didn't see any reason to trust that their interpretation of the facts was necessarily any more valid than
So, what happened? I don't know, but I've got more coffee to drink.
0 comments:
Post a Comment